Public skill / source-pinned
scientific-critical-thinking
Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.
Agent SkillGitHub sourceDigest checked
Package / manifest
The exact contents,
before install.
- Content SHA
050f9c94fc92c61c…- Package digest
99f16e69ba6295ac…- Download size
- 33.6 KB